Skip to main content

Comments

Submitted by JCWilliams (not verified) on 07 Sep 2020 - 05:11 Permalink

This is my favorite part. Page 341 of THE UNIVERSAL SWEEP OF DEATH <--> LIFE LAW OF NATURE.

"There is often an ambiguous, ambivalent communicative contact which becomes so garbled that there seems to be an endless attempt to communicate with no fruition. The contact, of course, is made:
death <--> life
life <--> death is reciprocally exchanged."

Of course to really understand deeply, one must read the previous 340 pages.

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 16 Aug 2014 - 11:23 Permalink

I went through this entry again to try to understand any of what this book says. I gave it an honest try, but I've got nothing.

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 29 May 2014 - 19:18 Permalink

Does it mean anything? There's a question indeed. I have added a page scan so you are better able to judge.

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 29 May 2014 - 00:38 Permalink

I'm not talking about your commentary, I'm talking about this madman's insane ramblings. Does it mean anything?? Just trying to read it gives me a headache.

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 29 May 2014 - 19:18 Permalink

Does it mean anything? There's a question indeed. I have added a page scan so you are better able to judge.

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 28 May 2014 - 23:21 Permalink

Just having some fun.

Bernard Shaw once reviewed a play by describing the scenery. Not that I am a Shaw, but one needs to piffle about from time to time, I think.

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 29 May 2014 - 00:38 Permalink

I'm not talking about your commentary, I'm talking about this madman's insane ramblings. Does it mean anything?? Just trying to read it gives me a headache.

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 29 May 2014 - 19:18 Permalink

Does it mean anything? There's a question indeed. I have added a page scan so you are better able to judge.

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 28 May 2014 - 12:37 Permalink

No seriously Alfred what in the hell

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 28 May 2014 - 23:21 Permalink

Just having some fun.

Bernard Shaw once reviewed a play by describing the scenery. Not that I am a Shaw, but one needs to piffle about from time to time, I think.

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 29 May 2014 - 00:38 Permalink

I'm not talking about your commentary, I'm talking about this madman's insane ramblings. Does it mean anything?? Just trying to read it gives me a headache.

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 29 May 2014 - 19:18 Permalink

Does it mean anything? There's a question indeed. I have added a page scan so you are better able to judge.

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 27 May 2014 - 21:47 Permalink

What in the hell

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 28 May 2014 - 12:37 Permalink

No seriously Alfred what in the hell

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 28 May 2014 - 23:21 Permalink

Just having some fun.

Bernard Shaw once reviewed a play by describing the scenery. Not that I am a Shaw, but one needs to piffle about from time to time, I think.

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 29 May 2014 - 00:38 Permalink

I'm not talking about your commentary, I'm talking about this madman's insane ramblings. Does it mean anything?? Just trying to read it gives me a headache.

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 29 May 2014 - 19:18 Permalink

Does it mean anything? There's a question indeed. I have added a page scan so you are better able to judge.

Submitted by Cuyler (not verified) on 27 May 2014 - 21:45 Permalink

Many authors of that era did it through Vantage Press or Philosophical Library - and some were more fun than Maxwell, like the man who "proved" that ALICE IN WONDERLAND is based on Judaic religious concepts.

Submitted by John Grant (not verified) on 26 May 2014 - 18:53 Permalink

How wise of Raymond Westbury Maxwell to publish this book himself, lest some meddling hack copyeditor cloud his meaning.