Yes, I freely admit I am biased against palmistry, having never encountered any substantive evidence for its claims. This book contains many assertions but no evidence, which is why I came down on it so hard. It pretends to be something more worthy than the average end-of-the-pier palmistry, but it's simply more pretentious, dressing up in the fancy clothes of scientific study while being in fact vapid nonsense.
Yes, I freely admit I am biased against palmistry, having never encountered any substantive evidence for its claims. This book contains many assertions but no evidence, which is why I came down on it so hard. It pretends to be something more worthy than the average end-of-the-pier palmistry, but it's simply more pretentious, dressing up in the fancy clothes of scientific study while being in fact vapid nonsense.
Yes, I freely admit I am…
Quite a thoughtless review…
Quite a thoughtless review borne entirely from bias that provides no real sense for the work amongst those of it's class.
Yes, I freely admit I am…
But is there a book called
But is there a book called Hand's Mysteries of the Dick?
I knew right away that this
I knew right away that this was the handiwork of a quack!