Skip to main content

Comments

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 22 Nov 2022 - 15:26 Permalink

Yes, I freely admit I am biased against palmistry, having never encountered any substantive evidence for its claims. This book contains many assertions but no evidence, which is why I came down on it so hard. It pretends to be something more worthy than the average end-of-the-pier palmistry, but it's simply more pretentious, dressing up in the fancy clothes of scientific study while being in fact vapid nonsense.
Submitted by Don't contact (not verified) on 13 Nov 2022 - 11:59 Permalink

Quite a thoughtless review borne entirely from bias that provides no real sense for the work amongst those of it's class.

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 22 Nov 2022 - 15:26 Permalink

Yes, I freely admit I am biased against palmistry, having never encountered any substantive evidence for its claims. This book contains many assertions but no evidence, which is why I came down on it so hard. It pretends to be something more worthy than the average end-of-the-pier palmistry, but it's simply more pretentious, dressing up in the fancy clothes of scientific study while being in fact vapid nonsense.